IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> AIG
UNDEAD
post 03/19/09 1:41pm
Post #1


First Lieutenant
******

Group: Forum Member
Posts: 118
Joined: December 11th 2008
Member No.: 7084
Xfire: UNDEADJAMES



So they're going to tax AIG (and other bailout recipients) %90 of the bonus amount ? most of these companies are behind on their taxes already.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Robert
post 03/19/09 2:01pm
Post #2


Major
********

Group: Not The One & Only
Posts: 650
Joined: September 29th 2007
Member No.: 4677



I agree, it's completely stupid.
The people who voted for the bailout are just as much to blame. All this really amounts to is the politicians taking predictable steps to deflect any outrage over them giving away tax payer money with zero knowledge how it will be used.
Let's assume the government gets this money back via extreme taxation, the politicians will only turn around an spend it on their next pork project.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
UNDEAD
post 03/19/09 2:56pm
Post #3


First Lieutenant
******

Group: Forum Member
Posts: 118
Joined: December 11th 2008
Member No.: 7084
Xfire: UNDEADJAMES



I could be wrong but hasn't the CEO for AIG been there for only 6 months ?
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Robert
post 03/19/09 3:21pm
Post #4


Major
********

Group: Not The One & Only
Posts: 650
Joined: September 29th 2007
Member No.: 4677



Yep 6 months. I think he's the 3rd CEO in little over 2 years.
Funny thing is one of the former CEO's, Greenberg who is considered by many to be the one to blame for the meltdown because he was behind the move to the risky credit deal and was forced out in 2005 because of fraud allegation, was just on TV denouncing people taking the bonuses.
Talk about the pot calling the kettle black
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Bargod
post 03/19/09 5:05pm
Post #5


The Bargod
Group Icon

Group: {MOB}
Posts: 5008
Joined: March 4th 2004
From: Dallas
Member No.: 641
Xfire: bargod



QUOTE(UNDEAD @ 03/19/09 2:56pm) *

I could be wrong but hasn't the CEO for AIG been there for only 6 months ?

The current CEO is also taking a $1 a year salary and didn't take any of the bonus money.

I still think they have a case with the "the contracts are void because they were based on fraudulent numbers" line of thought.


--------------------

IPB Image
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
UNDEAD
post 03/19/09 7:17pm
Post #6


First Lieutenant
******

Group: Forum Member
Posts: 118
Joined: December 11th 2008
Member No.: 7084
Xfire: UNDEADJAMES



i agree ,the tax route is a BS way to go about it. i actually felt a little bad for the
CEO of AIG for a few seconds,shrugged it off within seconds though.


i agree ,the tax route is a BS way to go about it. i actually felt a little bad for the
CEO of AIG for a few seconds,shrugged it off within seconds though.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



- Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 05/03/26 10:40am
Skin Designed by Canucks Fan Zone