POLAR CAPS MELTING Options

[UNDEAD 1]

THIS IS ALARMING!

http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20060915/sc_nm/...ent_arctic_dc_1

[Druid]

My point on peer review stands true as most ( not all ) of the predictions are based not on true scientific facts or methods. In stead are based on using completely unsupported and improvable variables when they compute their global climate change models.
The "Hocky Stick Graph" that was used for years as proof not only of global warming but man's impact on it passed peer review, is now seen not only as flawed but biased to support the scientist hypothesis.
Or another example, the "Drake equation" which mathematically proves the likelihood of extraterrestrial life, has passed peer review on numerous occasions. It passed peer review not because the scientists believed in it but accepted several unsupported variables used in the equation, variables no one could possibly no such as the percentage of planets/stat that should be capable off supporting life.


Actually I'm not dismissing the possibility of global warming, I am only dismissing the fanatical environmentalist and alarmists view it's caused by man and the sky is falling. That is an incredibly simplified view but is what's accepted by the general population. Which was my point in mentioning Mt. St. Helens in one day created more green house gases than Man has in our whole history.