| Kleerance |
06/30/07 4:36am
Post
#1
|
![]() Major ![]() Group: {MOB} Regs Posts: 536 Joined: May 4th 2006 Member No.: 1731 |
Discovery channel had a program where experts ranked top 10 tanks during history. It was based on fear factor, armour, mobility, fire power and mass production. And tanks which not had been in combat didn't make it to the list (Leo 2, T-90, Leclerc).
Check the link here. http://military.discovery.com/convergence/.../slideshow.html So which tank won? Maybe Rommel can give you the answer. -------------------- ![]() Members Of Barbarossa ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
| Ouch |
06/30/07 5:47pm
Post
#2
|
|
Major ![]() Group: {MOB} Posts: 558 Joined: February 19th 2006 Member No.: 1601 |
Kinda funny that the German panther tank was not even on the list. I bet if germany would have had the resources like russia did, and they would have kicked out 50000 panther tanks. The war on the east front would have been a lot different. I really dont understand how they can say the t-34 is #1 when toe to toe fighting against either a tiger or a panther they would have gotten torn up. I do understand that they were able to make mass amounts of these also the americans with the sherman, But this is suppose to be the top 10 tanks not how many you can dish out.
-------------------- |
| Kleerance |
07/01/07 6:26am
Post
#3
|
![]() Major ![]() Group: {MOB} Regs Posts: 536 Joined: May 4th 2006 Member No.: 1731 |
Kinda funny that the German panther tank was not even on the list. I bet if germany would have had the resources like russia did, and they would have kicked out 50000 panther tanks. The war on the east front would have been a lot different. I really dont understand how they can say the t-34 is #1 when toe to toe fighting against either a tiger or a panther they would have gotten torn up. I do understand that they were able to make mass amounts of these also the americans with the sherman, But this is suppose to be the top 10 tanks not how many you can dish out. The "dish-out" was actually part of this ranking. That's why Challenger is so low on the list - cause there's only a handful of them out there (380 I think world wide). And thats why Sherman and T-52 made it that high to this list because of the ease of production. They got lousy scores on the other topics. But I partially agree you - It's like saying that Ferrari is a lousy car because there's so few of them Yes, you right, it was T-34 but it's a old tank. [color="#ffff66"][/color] As an old tank commander at Leopard 1 I get tears in my eyes -------------------- ![]() Members Of Barbarossa ![]() |
Kleerance Top 10 tanks 06/30/07 4:36am
Rommel Discovery channel had a program where experts ran... 06/30/07 6:38am
Barkmann 1. T-34
[size=3][b]2. M-1
[size=3][b]3. Tiger
[... 06/30/07 12:02pm
Rommel [size=3][b]1. T-34
[size=3][b]2. M-1
[size=3][b... 06/30/07 5:00pm
Barkmann T-34 was a good tank all around, good armour, good... 06/30/07 8:59pm
Jack sigh no t-80s or t-72 or js-2 07/02/07 1:16am![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 05/03/26 5:02pm |