wondering everyones thoughts on this Options

[UNDEAD 1]

im split on this one,something tells me our gov will take advantage of this down the road.



http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20071218/pl_nm/...u9leqt1OD0E1vAI

[T/A6Pak]

Pearl Harbour was terrorism in my opinion.. many civilian victims. This was a plan put in place with people working on the inside providing the enemy with vital information as to what was where, providing pictures and photographs. Maybe the informants didn't set the bombs off personally, but there information provided the means and ends to the destruction. (internal cells)

I don't expect all to agree with my opinion, but I base mine on the terrorism training I had while being part of a specialty unit after 911. Most information is received through informants. In order to get a warrant you do not need infomants names or written statements. That in itself would put the informant in an vulnerable position. You just have to state that the informant has provided reliable information in the past, unknown reliability or why you believe it's true. There are other ways to lock up a person of interest... especially with this information. GPS is a great asset to many areas of policing.

If you really knew what goes on already, many people would be paranoid without having the new legislation.

IMO, it's all about power to Bush and wanting to leave a mark before his departure.