| PFC Mustangman |
04/17/08 2:11pm
Post
#1
|
![]() First Lieutenant ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Forum Member Posts: 158 Joined: May 26th 2007 From: Texas Member No.: 3305 |
|
![]() ![]() |
| Hellfighter |
04/17/08 3:15pm
Post
#2
|
|
Major General ![]() Group: {MOB} Posts: 2111 Joined: November 15th 2005 From: Quebec, Canada Member No.: 1424 Xfire: hellfighter1x |
While I still don't opt for 9-11 conspiracy theories as they are, I do go for the neo-con Iran agenda angle as I have done for the last several months.
I actually came across that analysis a few years ago and didn't think much of it at the time regarding the gradual constriction of Iran. For me its the real reason for the Cheney/Bush admin's impulse to grab Iraq. For a couple of years before the war I couldn't figure out why the Iraqi AA defences were being taken out with above normal regularity. Well it seems obvious these were pre-strikes for an invasion plan that was already set in motion. Hence why up until then everything was just talk and no-one wished to pull the trigger... the neo-cons were itching to do it under any false pre-text IF saddam didn't agree to vacate his position in Iraq. This post has been edited by Hellfighter: 04/17/08 3:16pm -------------------- ![]() ![]() |
PFC Mustangman James Bond 04/17/08 2:11pm
Robert Pretty sad when your biggest spoke person's cr... 04/17/08 5:09pm![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 05/04/26 1:43am |