Bush admin makes me puke Options

[Hellfighter]

So here's the latest regarding 'mission accomplished'....
Can the lies by the Bush admin get more nauseating - I'm sure they can....
Look at this one -explaining away what 'Mission Accomplished' really meant.
Why do these Bush croney/minions/goons think that when they spew out their rubbish in pathetic lies that the majority of Americans/the world think like gullable numbskulled neocons and war-mongerors;
http://youtube.com/watch?v=tm9-cZ2s7i4&feature=related

[PFC Mustangman]

Mission is defined by Webster as "a special task to which one devotes his life.Put your head back in the trash can and keep on puking.

www.youtube.com/watch?v=4odmtUBtfeU

www.youtube.com/watch?v=E6TdumM9g54

[Hellfighter]

Mission is defined by Webster as "a special task to which one devotes his life.Put your head back in the trash can and keep on puking.

www.youtube.com/watch?v=4odmtUBtfeU

Robert check out 00:58 of Mustang's clip.... there's nothing dubious in what Bush said on the aircraft carrier... in spite of what can be argued about what the banner meant, these are his words-
"And [in?] the battle of Iraq, the United States, and our Allies have prevailed"

This ranks with -
Condy Rice acting non-chalant in a post 9-11 Commission when referring to intel reports of 'Bin Laden planning to fly planes into buildings' just months before 9-11.
And Cheney being gung-ho when serious questions are asked about Allies future in Iraq.
With Rumsfeld grinning antics before reporters when he was downplaying crisis after crisis in Iraq.
With Gonzalez and his 'oh well' attitude as the attorney chief when faced with enquiries about his underhanded tactics.
Bush handing important staff jobs over to a series of incompetents -> General Petraeus was the first excellent selection he finally made.... I don't agree with everything the General probably feels compelled to say lately, but I bet after he retires and writes a book we'll get his real opinion on Iraq and the Bush admin's clumsiness.

It's no wonder the admin has a cruddy approval rating - do they need their actions defended in the least -not from my viewpoint.
Should they be made an example of by all the weight a free people can bear down on them?
-Absolutely ->for if the Dems get in - or whoever in the next election -and from that point on, let them all know "Fool me once" is enough for voters regarding an admin stomping around with jackboots -with a recklessness intent and the lofty assertion they do not have to be held accountable.



This post has been edited by Hellfighter: 05/03/08 6:55am