IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

> TRILATERAL COMMISSION
PFC Mustangman
post 05/06/08 12:00pm
Post #1


First Lieutenant
******

Group: Forum Member
Posts: 158
Joined: May 26th 2007
From: Texas
Member No.: 3305



A closed door meeting,not a secret meeting,now its just closed door.Must be a difference. biggrin.gif

I thought this was just a conspiracy theory? they even have a list of those who attended.

www.americanfreepress.net/html/global_elite_gather_135.html

www.americanfreepress.net/html/trilateral_commission_attendee.html



User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Replies
Robert
post 05/06/08 10:18pm
Post #2


Major
********

Group: Not The One & Only
Posts: 650
Joined: September 29th 2007
Member No.: 4677



The Trilateral Commission has been around for over 3 decades.
I don't see how anyone can consider what they do as secret when everything is freely published.
In fact everything they have done since 2000 is available on their website.
So I don't understand how anyone can point to they and claim,
Secret member of the New World Order.
Here is an interesting article about who said it this time
http://www.americanchronicle.com/articles/38058

American Free Press....
Has published several conflicting 9-11 conspiracy articles, why would anyone trust them when they can't even decide which 9-11 conspiracy they believe.
Are big into the "Federal income tax is illegal so you don't have to pay it.", follow their advice on that and see how far it gets you.
Has published several holocaust denial articles. Apparently to the people at AFP, it was just a bunch of Jew propaganda.

I just read through a dozen old articles and didn't see a single one where they offered any supporting evidence to the claims they make.
That would be my biggest problem with such sites.
They call themselves news sites but completely fail to adhere to any accepted journalistic standards.
One of the most imporatant ones being, clear seperation between news and opinion.
What they really are, is nothing more than glorified blogs calling themselves news.
Which I don't have a problem with, I highly enjoy reading editorials. I just think they should be honest enough to admit they are actually editorials. Opinion pieces, used to express their personal views, not unbiased news coverage.

I understand there is a cetain level of bias in the main stream media but the majority of the bias comes not from the main news reporting but the Op-Ed an editorials done by every major news orginization.
What's important is they attempt to seperate, some better than others, their news and editorials.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic


Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



- Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 05/03/26 11:52am
Skin Designed by Canucks Fan Zone