IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

> Introducing NoClassBobBass
NoClassBobBass
post 02/17/06 5:54pm
Post #1


Sergeant
Group Icon

Group: {MOB} Regs
Posts: 61
Joined: February 16th 2006
Member No.: 1599



hello there I'm from PEI Canada im 32 years old i find myself becoming really addicted to this game
i would like to thank the mob clan for these wonderful servers my friend and I really enjoy being able to watch our stats. I find my stats are not at the top but im usually in the top 5 -3 in every game i find my willingness to sacrifice myself to get back and defend bases tends to hurt my kill stats but it does help the team win and thats what I'm all about
thanks for making my evenings fun and i look forward to playing with you all biggrin.gif or killing you all if your against me next time smile.gif


--------------------
NoClassBobBass
I may have "NoClass"but I'LL still kick your ass!
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Replies
BlackPlague
post 03/03/06 7:52am
Post #2


Colonel
*********

Group: Forum Member
Posts: 1012
Joined: September 3rd 2005
From: Atlanta Ga. USA
Member No.: 1325



Welcome man, I like people who try to play realistic, like actually taking cover and stuff without runnin gun.


--------------------
IPB Image IPB Image [
QUOTE
Jesus throws satchels at people...
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Hellfighter
post 03/04/06 12:06pm
Post #3


Major General
Group Icon

Group: {MOB}
Posts: 2111
Joined: November 15th 2005
From: Quebec, Canada
Member No.: 1424
Xfire: hellfighter1x



QUOTE(BlackPlague @ 03/03/06 7:52am) *
Welcome man, I like people who try to play realistic, like actually taking cover and stuff without runnin gun.


Interesting topic here; -as you know I'm generally a run n gun player and I used to take and give alot of flak on so-called 'realistic' CoD servers. The servers hosters would often babble about not charging in the open because it wasn't 'realistic'- their belief was that all infantry in WW2 followed todays tactics of fire and movement in combat. However for many years I've read many a biography account of grunts of the period and generally fire and movement was usually the tactics only of elite German units and British paras. From all the 'real' accounts I've read, U.S paras of the time were fearsome because of their dash and lethal run and gun effectiveness.... one episode that stands out if I recall correctly is of a para bursting into a German messhall on D-day night, where he took occupants by surprise and mowed down a couple of dozen with his submachinegun. In Normandy and the Bulge paras made successful charges across open fields with guns blazing from hips and not taking cover/going prone in the entire attack- yes, they took lots of casualties in the process. Russian human wave infantry attacks were generally little more than shoulder to shoulder [crummy generals!!!]. I've read of even British regular infantry walking in line in their attacks blazing weapons from the hip ahead of them. It was probably the Brit Paras undoing at Arnhem that they cautiously moved through Arnhem's outskirts with 'taking cover' tactics against a very inferior sized but cunning German garrison. In so doing, that first day, little more than a battalion out of an entire division made it to the bridge as German reinforcements soon arrived to sway the balance. I have a feeling the 82nd or 101st US airborne divisions would've accomplished that mission better with their dashing/gunning somewhat reckless tactics- a style which I doubt they'd employ nowadays unless someone cares to correct me on that.


This post has been edited by Hellfighter: 03/04/06 12:07pm


--------------------



User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic


Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



- Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 05/03/26 11:21pm
Skin Designed by Canucks Fan Zone