|ax| rematch, June 3, 2006 Options

[UNDEAD 1]

i could do it but no practice prior though-wifey has a problem with 4 to 6 hour stints on cod! plus i burn out by second round. it wont be 3 hours!

[logik]

i don't like the whole "no-time limit" thing. i, speaking just for myself, don't have enough time to play 3+ hours for one match of call of duty because neither side can take the final base.

trust me, we won't let it go 3 hours...

we know how to take a final base.

and what's wrong with wanting to finish a game that was started? i don't like the whole "time limit" thing. we were just getting warmed up and the round was over.

[Lord Lipton]

make the round a bit longer then, don't make it no time at all, make a compromise, no?

[laxl Till Lindemann]

The problem with time limits is there is no clear cut winner, unless all the bases are destroyed that is. There is always the debate on who would have won if time had not run out. I would say a "no time limit" match would last at the max, no longer than 3 hours, and thats a large margin. A 1-1/2 to 2 hour would be the most likely time frame.

[The-Blind-Norwegian]

I played an eight hour game on the |ax|-server last autumn, I think it was on the Ardennes map. Well, once is enough for me.......
I could hardly get up from the chair............ lol

Let the rounds be for one hour, and don't delete the points after the first round. Then several people will get arty, and it is more likely to get a winner.

Well, that's what I think anyway......

TBN

[UNDEAD 1]

I played an eight hour game on the |ax|-server last autumn, I think it was on the Ardennes map. Well, once is enough for me.......
I could hardly get up from the chair............ lol

Let the rounds be for one hour, and don't delete the points after the first round. Then several people will get arty, and it is more likely to get a winner.

Well, that's what I think anyway......

TBN

i agree to that!

[logik]

no time limit...

we promise we'll make it fast on you. unless you guys aren't up for the challenge.

we played your rules, we're challenging you to ours <period>

[Lord Lipton]

have fun then.

i'd play for an hour

i'm not sitting my ass in this here chair for 3 hours playing a damn map because neither team can destroy the last damn base.

thats insanity.

[logik]

i'd play for an hour

i don't see us letting it go farther than that anyway

[CommanderChoth]

You can talk yourselves up all you want, but the fact still remains the matches will be of unpredictable length...and a lot of us have lives with schedules and work and like to have a time frame.

Also, all this crap you are feeding me is starting to leave a bad taste in my mouth. Save the garbage talk for the playing field, we WILL meet your terms unless they are bogus...and as of now, they are.

And guess what...If we don't like it, we don't have to play you <period>

This post has been edited by CommanderChoth: 05/12/06 7:36pm

[logik]

so are you guys accepting or not?

[Lord Lipton]

i'd play for an hour

i don't see us letting it go farther than that anyway

cockiness is one of the worst qualities a person can have.

good job, you should be proud.


PS - no, i'm not playing.

This post has been edited by Lord Lipton: 05/13/06 12:36am

[logik]

look man, i'm not being cocky...

it's a freaking call of duty match. i'm just indulging in some good natured ball busting with a group of guys that i thought we were cool with... please correct me if i was wrong.

[The-Blind-Norwegian]

i'd play for an hour

i don't see us letting it go farther than that anyway

Well, then one hour round is ok - and we got a match.

TBN

[HammaTime]

As an alternative to playing with no time-limit would be a sudden death. First team to destroy a base wins.