IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

18 Pages V « < 6 7 8 9 10 > »   
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> What REALLY happened on 9/11, the truth of 9/11... carry an open mind.
Silver
post 02/23/05 9:51pm
Post #106


Major General
**********

Group: Banned
Posts: 6596
Joined: March 30th 2004
Member No.: 680



QUOTE(=AFA=Napoleon @ 02/23/05 7:20pm)
whooa! I'm just gonna jump in on this one here. How can any of you think that the building was blown up from the inside?
*



none of us do...xcept loopy over there
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Too Exclusive
post 02/23/05 10:26pm
Post #107


Major
********

Group: Forum Member
Posts: 574
Joined: February 14th 2005
Member No.: 1068



QUOTE(=AFA=Napoleon @ 02/23/05 7:20pm)
whooa! I'm just gonna jump in on this one here. How can any of you think that the building was blown up from the inside?  blink.gif  blink.gif

NOT POSSIBLE! First off, the claims that the builing blew outward are correct, the floors blew out, reason: When the upper part of the towers collapsed, the top started to fall down ontop of the lowwer half that was less damaged, the top falling put pressure on the lowwer half causing the inside of the building's pressure to increase greatly, if you were in that tower alive during the collapse you would have felt your ear drums pop. The pressure created needed to go somewhere so it went out, almost like and explosion, this happend on each floor as the building crashed down, floor by floor. This is the reason for the massive dust cloud that swept outward after the tower fell. If it had fallen over sidways, it would not have created such large cloud. I can assure you there were no bombs that went off in the towers after the crash. It is inconceviable. The fire created by the planes alone was enough to melt the metal structure of the tower. The melting structure caused the collapse, not a "bomb".

well there's 2 things you have wrong in here. first of all, we've already established that the fires weren't nearly hot enough to melt the metal structure. so clearly that is a false statement. 2nd of all, i dont know WHERE you get the idea that each floor was air tight, because it was not. if you think that somehow there was no place for the air to go then that means every person in the tower would've suffocated. clearly u must think about things like this before posting...
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
=AFA=Napoleon
post 02/24/05 5:49pm
Post #108


PFC
*

Group: Forum Member
Posts: 15
Joined: February 23rd 2005
From: USA
Member No.: 1083



That is the point, the air all escaped out, that was the "explosion" that people saw. I 'm not tottaly sure about the fire thing but it seems perfectly plaussible that the fire could have weakened the structure.

Edit:
It's simple physics, take a paper bag and blow it up with air then pop it. Was there a bomb in the paper bag? No, it was an increase in pressure that released outward, same principal with the WTC.

This post has been edited by =AFA=Napoleon: 02/24/05 5:55pm


--------------------
user posted image
=AFA=Napoleon
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Too Exclusive
post 02/24/05 6:56pm
Post #109


Major
********

Group: Forum Member
Posts: 574
Joined: February 14th 2005
Member No.: 1068



yes but u missed my point. the bag only explodes if the only way for the air to get out is by ripping the bag open. that's why u hear the pop because of the high pressure air escaping and becoming low pressure so quickly. i understand ur concept, but my point was that there were other ways for the air to escape than just outwards thru the windows, because "explosions" shattered the windows and for your theory to be correct, that means every floor would have to be air tight meaning no air can get in or out of the floor, so it has to break the glass to get out. the floors were NOT air tight. if that were the case, then everyone would've suffocated eventually. that's why there's ventilation and shit. the air's able to escape thru a. the ventilation b. the elevators c. the central core. do u understand what im getting at?
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
=AFA=Napoleon
post 02/24/05 7:58pm
Post #110


PFC
*

Group: Forum Member
Posts: 15
Joined: February 23rd 2005
From: USA
Member No.: 1083



QUOTE(Too Exclusive @ 02/24/05 5:56pm)
yes but u missed my point. the bag only explodes if the only way for the air to get out is by ripping the bag open. that's why u hear the pop because of the high pressure air escaping and becoming low pressure so quickly. i understand ur concept, but my point was that there were other ways for the air to escape than just outwards thru the windows, because "explosions" shattered the windows and for your theory to be correct, that means every floor would have to be air tight meaning no air can get in or out of the floor, so it has to break the glass to get out. the floors were NOT air tight. if that were the case, then everyone would've suffocated eventually. that's why there's ventilation and shit. the air's able to escape thru a. the ventilation b. the elevators c. the central core. do u understand what im getting at?
*




Either way, the building falling down would have been enough to break the windows, no?


--------------------
user posted image
=AFA=Napoleon
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Too Exclusive
post 02/24/05 8:37pm
Post #111


Major
********

Group: Forum Member
Posts: 574
Joined: February 14th 2005
Member No.: 1068



well that's a given, but the thing is u have HUGE steel beams being shot horizontally outward with enough force to punch thru buildings 100's of feet away? how?
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Silver
post 02/24/05 9:09pm
Post #112


Major General
**********

Group: Banned
Posts: 6596
Joined: March 30th 2004
Member No.: 680



im going out on a limb here....you stood infront a truck carrying a load of stupid sticks....didnt you...
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Stockguy
post 02/25/05 12:45pm
Post #113


Major General
Group Icon

Group: MOB
Posts: 2989
Joined: January 6th 2004
From: Madison, Wisconsin
Member No.: 555
Xfire: Stockguy



lol, i think he did.


--------------------
IPB Image
IPB Image
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Too Exclusive
post 02/25/05 3:46pm
Post #114


Major
********

Group: Forum Member
Posts: 574
Joined: February 14th 2005
Member No.: 1068



QUOTE(Too Exclusive @ 02/24/05 7:37pm)
well that's a given, but the thing is u have HUGE steel beams being shot horizontally outward with enough force to punch thru buildings 100's of feet away? how?

QUOTE(D. Silver @ 02/24/05 8:09pm)
im going out on a limb here....you stood infront a truck carrying a load of stupid sticks....didnt you...

how about instead of JUST saying i'm stupid, offer reason why my statement is a stupid one. i asked a question and you respond by saying im stupid. im still looking for my answer to the question.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
ScarFace
post 02/25/05 4:59pm
Post #115


Major
Group Icon

Group: {MOB}
Posts: 594
Joined: November 2nd 2003
Member No.: 495



QUOTE(Too Exclusive @ 02/25/05 2:46pm)
QUOTE(Too Exclusive @ 02/24/05  7:37pm)
well that's a given, but the thing is u have HUGE steel beams being shot horizontally outward with enough force to punch thru buildings 100's of feet away? how?

QUOTE(D. Silver @ 02/24/05 8:09pm)
im going out on a limb here....you stood infront a truck carrying a load of stupid sticks....didnt you...

how about instead of JUST saying i'm stupid, offer reason why my statement is a stupid one. i asked a question and you respond by saying im stupid. im still looking for my answer to the question.
*




In case you havent noticed WE already disproved 99% of your crap.

Your just repeating yourself now.



Plus Napolean on here is also a little wack-o.


--------------------
IPB Image,
IPB Image,
IPB Image
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
=AFA=Napoleon
post 02/25/05 5:43pm
Post #116


PFC
*

Group: Forum Member
Posts: 15
Joined: February 23rd 2005
From: USA
Member No.: 1083



A little wack-o??? Try really wack-o. dribble.gif

I just wonder, how can you think that a massive airplane crashing into this tower couldn't knock it down? You all saw the videos, it's not like the planes were a hoax, the government isn't trying to cover up a conspiracy to blow up the WTC. It was an attack by al-queda. That's it. There were no bombs, a massive airplane was sufficent.


--------------------
user posted image
=AFA=Napoleon
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Silver
post 02/25/05 9:18pm
Post #117


Major General
**********

Group: Banned
Posts: 6596
Joined: March 30th 2004
Member No.: 680



QUOTE(Too Exclusive @ 02/25/05 2:46pm)
offer reason why my statement is a stupid one. i asked a question and you respond by saying im stupid. im still looking for my answer to the question.
*



ok young grasshopper.....in words u will under stand....IT FELL DOWN AND WENT BOOM.... like a fat man sitting on a balloon it went POP and was all over the place....

seriously.......do your parents encourage these thoughts? or do they think the same shit? just wondering if the apple fell from the tree....should society give you a permit to breed or go for the nuder?
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Too Exclusive
post 02/25/05 9:20pm
Post #118


Major
********

Group: Forum Member
Posts: 574
Joined: February 14th 2005
Member No.: 1068



QUOTE(ScarFace @ 02/25/05 3:59pm)
In case you havent noticed WE already disproved 99% of your crap.

you haven't disproved anything. ive conceded one argument i dont know enough about at the present moment. all you did for the rest is rebute with YOUR crap.

This post has been edited by Too Exclusive: 02/25/05 9:26pm
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Too Exclusive
post 02/25/05 9:25pm
Post #119


Major
********

Group: Forum Member
Posts: 574
Joined: February 14th 2005
Member No.: 1068



QUOTE(ScarFace @ 02/14/05 7:51pm)
I knew about the Pentagon cover up but I didn't realize this also involved the WTC.

apparently u thought the way i did at one point as well.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
ScarFace
post 02/26/05 12:15am
Post #120


Major
Group Icon

Group: {MOB}
Posts: 594
Joined: November 2nd 2003
Member No.: 495



No, I just kept an open mind as you asked.


Read my next post INCASE YOU MISSED IT.


--------------------
IPB Image,
IPB Image,
IPB Image
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

18 Pages V « < 6 7 8 9 10 > » 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
13 User(s) are reading this topic (13 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



- Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 05/04/26 4:22pm
Skin Designed by Canucks Fan Zone