Full Version: VERDIC TO BE HANDED DOWN 4:45
Get on the news now if you don't want to miss it.
Bastard's not guilty.... WTF?!
Goes to show a grown man can sleep with children and get by.
i never made up my mind if he was or wasnt. i left it up to 12 people to make that decision. 4 million wasted now lets see how much he sues the state for.
only in america can a ex-black guy rape little kids and get awat scot-free...
OJ and now MJ... anyone see the similarity with them?
Both were black.. now Both are white... Both are guilty
OJ and now MJ... anyone see the similarity with them?
Both were black.. now Both are white... Both are guilty
ghost i dont know if you ever saw a black guy before but umm.... OJ is black. hes as black as a black guy can be. his wife probally deserved to get killed who gives a shit about OJ. I applaud the man for getting away with it. MJ unless you have evidence that he molested someone or you he is now NOT GUILTY. and i dont like MJ. hes a freak, but it dont make him guilty.
QUOTE(TheGhost @ 06/13/05 4:54pm)
only in america can a ex-black guy rape little kids and get awat scot-free...
OJ and now MJ... anyone see the similarity with them?
Both were black.. now Both are white... Both are guilty
OJ and now MJ... anyone see the similarity with them?
Both were black.. now Both are white... Both are guilty
OJ got away with it cuz he didn't do it. His son did. LA cops blew the case.
he had something to do with it....did MJ??? man he is a freak! but it will take more then some Kluxer to convict him...and it wont be done in CA, NY...mabe....
QUOTE(PISTOFFBAD @ 06/13/05 4:20pm)
grown man
This is arguable lol.
[SIZE=1]
This is arguable lol.
lmao, agreed. But we will never know what exactly happened.
QUOTE(Blakjak @ 06/13/05 6:46pm)
QUOTE(PISTOFFBAD @ 06/13/05 4:20pm)
grown man
This is arguable lol.
lmao, agreed. But we will never know what exactly happened.
Just as I predicted.
but really 
hes a chester
hes a chester
only a matter of time when crazed fans strikes again with another tacky lawsuit.
Personally I too thought he was guilty of course, but who knows other than God himself and the sick fuck who could be hiding in little holes like Sadaam.
Aww Naww,
FlameAFlave
Aww Naww,
FlameAFlave
I'm happy, now he can babysit my twins when they are born!
Cypher
Cypher
Jurors Say They Were Bothered by Mother
By LINDA DEUTSCH
SANTA MARIA, Calif. (AP) - The jurors who acquitted Michael Jackson of child molestation had harsh words for the accuser's mother, who made them uncomfortable during her jumbled and volatile testimony.
Jurors said they were especially put off when the mother snapped her fingers at them while on the stand. ``I disliked it intensely when she snapped her fingers at us. That's when I thought `Don't snap your fingers at me, lady,' said juror No. 5, a retired widow.
Jurors spoke Monday in a tightly controlled news conference in a spare courtroom outfitted to look more like a TV studio. As a condition of their willingness to participate, they were identified by number, not by name.
Later, several used their names during interviews with the news media, including Juror No. 1, Raymond Hultman, 62. He told The Associated Press in an interview at his home that he believed Jackson may have molested at least two boys - but not the accuser.
He said he voted to acquit Jackson in the current case because he had doubts about the accuser's credibility. ``That's not to say he's an innocent man,'' Hultman said. ``He's just not guilty of the crimes he's been charged with.''
The foreman, later identified as Paul Rodriguez, said jurors made a plan from the start of deliberations that they were going to treat Jackson like any other individual and avoid being star-struck. After that, ``we were able to deal with it just as fairly as we could as with anybody else.''
They also found no ``smoking gun'' in the evidence.
``We expected probably better evidence ... something that was a little more convincing, and it just wasn't there,'' said juror No. 10.
They also had trouble with the prosecution's timeline of events. Prosecutors said Jackson molested the teenage boy while trying to deal with the fallout from a television documentary that prompted outrage over his sleepovers at Neverland.
``The timeline was really a concern,'' said juror No. 3, a 50-year-old woman.
Juror No. 10, a 45-year-old woman with one adult child and two teenage sons, discussed the panel's feelings about the 46-year-old pop star sharing his bed with boys.
``What mother in her right mind would allow that to happen? Just freely volunteer your child to sleep with someone. Not so much just Michael Jackson but any person for that matter. That's something that mothers are naturally concerned with,'' the juror said.
Rodriguez indicated he felt the mother singled him out because he was a fellow Hispanic.
``The mother, when she looked at me and snapped her fingers a few times and she says, 'You know how our culture is,' and winks at me, I thought, 'No, that's not the way our culture is.''
The mass of about 2,200 credentialed media representatives who gathered for the verdict surprised jurors. But juror No. 1 said, ``By the time we got to deliberations, we were all so conditioned to the media, we didn't pay any attention.''
The foreman said the jury took only two votes. They divided up tasks and used their copious notes to follow the timeline of events.
By LINDA DEUTSCH
SANTA MARIA, Calif. (AP) - The jurors who acquitted Michael Jackson of child molestation had harsh words for the accuser's mother, who made them uncomfortable during her jumbled and volatile testimony.
Jurors said they were especially put off when the mother snapped her fingers at them while on the stand. ``I disliked it intensely when she snapped her fingers at us. That's when I thought `Don't snap your fingers at me, lady,' said juror No. 5, a retired widow.
Jurors spoke Monday in a tightly controlled news conference in a spare courtroom outfitted to look more like a TV studio. As a condition of their willingness to participate, they were identified by number, not by name.
Later, several used their names during interviews with the news media, including Juror No. 1, Raymond Hultman, 62. He told The Associated Press in an interview at his home that he believed Jackson may have molested at least two boys - but not the accuser.
He said he voted to acquit Jackson in the current case because he had doubts about the accuser's credibility. ``That's not to say he's an innocent man,'' Hultman said. ``He's just not guilty of the crimes he's been charged with.''
The foreman, later identified as Paul Rodriguez, said jurors made a plan from the start of deliberations that they were going to treat Jackson like any other individual and avoid being star-struck. After that, ``we were able to deal with it just as fairly as we could as with anybody else.''
They also found no ``smoking gun'' in the evidence.
``We expected probably better evidence ... something that was a little more convincing, and it just wasn't there,'' said juror No. 10.
They also had trouble with the prosecution's timeline of events. Prosecutors said Jackson molested the teenage boy while trying to deal with the fallout from a television documentary that prompted outrage over his sleepovers at Neverland.
``The timeline was really a concern,'' said juror No. 3, a 50-year-old woman.
Juror No. 10, a 45-year-old woman with one adult child and two teenage sons, discussed the panel's feelings about the 46-year-old pop star sharing his bed with boys.
``What mother in her right mind would allow that to happen? Just freely volunteer your child to sleep with someone. Not so much just Michael Jackson but any person for that matter. That's something that mothers are naturally concerned with,'' the juror said.
Rodriguez indicated he felt the mother singled him out because he was a fellow Hispanic.
``The mother, when she looked at me and snapped her fingers a few times and she says, 'You know how our culture is,' and winks at me, I thought, 'No, that's not the way our culture is.''
The mass of about 2,200 credentialed media representatives who gathered for the verdict surprised jurors. But juror No. 1 said, ``By the time we got to deliberations, we were all so conditioned to the media, we didn't pay any attention.''
The foreman said the jury took only two votes. They divided up tasks and used their copious notes to follow the timeline of events.
Wtf?!
I've been in Denver(still am) and have not been keeping up with the news at all.
What in the world?!?!!?
Probably costed him a billion dollars to do it...but whatever.
I've been in Denver(still am) and have not been keeping up with the news at all.
What in the world?!?!!?
Probably costed him a billion dollars to do it...but whatever.
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.