Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: Why we are at war against terrorism
{MOB} Forums > MOB Discussion Forum - PUBLIC > War On Terror
Pages: 1, 2
realdeal
Unfortunately some forget, others may simply put it out of their mind since it's been almost 3 years now. But please take a look at the links below to remind yourself.

FIRST PLANE HITS THE WORLD TRADE CENTER


SECOND PLANE HITS THE WORLD TRADE CENTER

EXCLUSIVE FOOTAGE OF SECOND PLANE HITTING THE WORLD TRADE CENTER

CNN RECAP OF 9/11
futureman
no words to describe that.
lithium
You right Real. We will never forget Mr. Bush for his incompetence. It happened on his watch and he should be one of many responsible for it.
DIESEL
QUOTE (lithium @ Jul 27 2004, 04:05 PM)
You right Real. We will never forget Mr. Bush for his incompetence. It happened on his watch and he should be one of many responsible for it.

are u for fucking real Lith...go ahead and vote for Kerry see what happens then and im not even American but i will tell you BUSH is the man with steel balls and im glad he is leading your country then some two-faced fuck Kerry who will probably win cuz he's greasing everyone cocks
.AmbiencE.
God Damn Liberals. action-smiley-055.gif
realdeal
QUOTE (lithium @ Jul 27 2004, 05:05 PM)
You right Real. We will never forget Mr. Bush for his incompetence. It happened on his watch and he should be one of many responsible for it.

This is from another post I made:

I hope you're not blaming Bush for the 9/11 attacks. I blame the Clinton administration. For 8 years the Clinton administration did what they could to basically destroy the defense budget. FBI agents were trying to fight through government imposed walls, handcuffed by government imposed restrictions and starved for basic information technology.

And let's not forget the terrorist attacks which happened under Clinton's watch:

1. The first WTC attack on 2/26/93. Clinton did nothing. He didn't even visit the site. He also allowed this attack to be classified as a criminal act by individuals, even though the mastermind of the attack was Ramzi Youssef who, by the way was an Iraqi intelligence agent.

2. 10 months after the inital WTC attack, there was the attack in Mogadishu on american military forces who were in the country to bring food to starving Somalis.

3. The 1996 bombing of the Khobar Towers in Saudia Arabia. This was done by Iranian and Palestinian terrorists acting on behalf of Al-Qaeda. The Saudi government refused to cooperate in finding those responsible - the Clinton administration did nothing about it.

4. 1998 - the year of the Lewinsky, Al-Qaeda blew up the US embassies in Kenya and Tanzania. Over 200 people were killed and over 6,000 injured. Clinton's response? The missile strike of the medicine factory and an EMPTY terrorist camp.

Despite the above, EVERY year that these attacks occurred, the Democratic leaders supported bills to cut US intelligence funding and other funding for CIA operations.

Additionally, I think it was 1995 when Al Gore was appointed to head a task force to tighten aiport security. That task force's key reccomendation which might have prevented 9/11, was rejected by the White House on fears of racial profiling.
Who would have thought that Al gore was actually able to come up with a novel idea? And then for that idea only to fall upon deaf ears.
Stockguy
I agree with you real. I think that it was the Clinton administrations fault for not doing anything about it. Bush happened to come into the presidency at the wrong time and all this stuff is now being blamed by him. I believe that his intentions are good and that hes done the best that one person can do. I believe going into a second term would be the better term that hes had. It seems that whatever happens the president is automatically blamed for what happened and if nothing happens that major through a term that automatically means hes a good president. Just a couple of thoughts.
Druid
QUOTE (lithium @ Jul 27 2004, 03:05 PM)
You right Real. We will never forget Mr. Bush for his incompetence. It happened on his watch and he should be one of many responsible for it.

Sorry Lithium but thats one of the dumbest things you could say.
So by your reasoning, FDR should be held responsible for Pearl Harbor.

Everybody forgets hindsight is always perfect.

Here are some facts.
Everybody has been so quick to point out how "Bush was warned about the possiblity of airplanes being used for attacks but failed to act on it.
Fact is he recieved the same generalized warnng that has been in the security briefings for 10 years. Read that again if you missed it 10 Years.
In 1994 this possiblity even became a reality.
1) A disgruntled Federal Express worker tries to crash a DC-10 into a company building in Memphis but is overpowered by the crew.
2) A lone pilot crashes a small plane onto the White House grounds, just missing the President's bedroom.
3) An Air France flight is hijacked by a terrorist group linked to al-Qaeda, with the aim of crashing it into the Eiffel Tower, but a Special Forces team storm the plane before it takes off.
Please point out how anyone back in 1994 did anything to increase our security.
There is no way the required security changes would or could of been passed before 9-11 showing the need.

Janurary 9th 1995 Philippine investigators uncover an al-Qaeda plot to assassinate the Pope that would take place when he visits the Philippines in Feburary of 1995. While investigating that, they also uncover Operation Bojinka, planned by the same people. Bojinka was a plan to hijack and exploded 11 or 12 U.S. passenger planes over the Pacific Ocean simultaneously. Also included in the plan was mention of a second possible attack where planes would be hijacked and flown into “key structures in the United States. The World Trade Center, the White House, the Pentagon, the Capital, the CIA Headquaters, the Transamerican Tower, and the Sears Tower where mentioned.

1995
In the wake of the uncovering of the Operation Bojinka plot, a letter written by the terrorists who planned the failed 1993 WTC bombing is found on a computer disk in the Philippines. This letter warns that future attacks would be more precise and they would continue to target the WTC if their demands were not met. This letter was never sent, but its contents are revealed in a congressional security meeting.

April 1995
Time magazine's cover story reports on the potential for terrorists to kill thousands in highly destructive acts. Senator Sam Nunn outlines a scenario in which terrorists destroy the US Capitol Building by crashing a radio controlled airplane into it.

1996
Having found a business card of a US flight school in the possession of Bojinka plotter Abdul Hakim Murad the FBI investigates the US flight schools Murad attended. He had trained at about 6 flight schools off and on, starting in 1990. Apparently they stop their investigation when they fail to find any other potential suspects.

1996
The Senate Intelligence Committee is briefed concerning a planned suicide attack by individuals connected with Sheikh Omar Abdul-Rahman and a key al-Qaeda operative. The plan is to fly from Afghanistan to the US and attack the White House.

July -August 1996
US officials identify crop-dusters and suicide flights as potential terrorist weapons that could threaten the Olympic Games in Atlanta, Georgia. They take steps to prevent any air attacks. Planes are banned from getting too close to Olympic events. During the games, Black Hawk helicopters and US Customs Service jets are deployed to intercept suspicious aircraft over the Olympic venues. Agents monitor crop-duster flights within hundreds of miles of downtown Atlanta. Armed fighter jets are placed on standby at local air bases.

Late 1996
US intelligence learn of an Iranian plot to hijack a Japanese plane over Israel and crash it into Tel Aviv. While the plot was never carried out, it is one more example of intelligence agencies being aware that planes could be used as suicide weapons.

1998
A son of Sheikh Omar Abdel Rahman, the al-Qaeda leader convicted in 1995 of conspiring to blow up tunnels and other New York City landmarks, is heard to say that the best way to free his father from a US prison might be to hijack an American plane and exchange the hostages.
This is the exact same warning giving to Bush in August 02 report titled "Bin Laden Determined to Strike in US"
This is one that really amazes me. People are using this report to show how Bush knew about a possible attck and did nothing. When the fact is, it was nothing more than a rehashed report issued almost 6 years earlier.

May 1998
An FBI pilot sends his supervisor in the Oklahoma City FBI office a memo warning that he has observed “large numbers of Middle Eastern males receiving flight training at Oklahoma airports in recent months.” The memo, titled “Weapons of Mass Destruction,” further states this “may be related to planned terrorist activity” and speculates that “light planes would be an ideal means of spreading chemicals or biological agents.”
http://www.cooperativeresearch.org/timelin.../m29fbimemo.jpg
In 1999 it is learned that an al-Qaeda agent had studied flight training in Norman, Oklahoma along with Hijackers Atta and Marwan Alshehhi. Zacarias Moussaoui does study at the school in early 2001.

May 1998
In a press conference from Afghanistan, bin Laden discusses “bringing the war home to America.” He indicates the results of his jihad will be “visible” within weeks.

June 1998
US intelligence obtains information from several sources that bin Laden is considering attacks in the US, including Washington and New York. This information is given to senior US officials in July 1998.

August 1998
A CIA intelligence report asserts that Arab terrorists are planning to fly a bomb-laden aircraft from a foreign country into the WTC. The FBI and the FAA don't take the threat seriously because of the state of aviation in that country. Later, other intelligence information connects this group to al-Qaeda.
A few weeks later, a captured member of the al-Qaeda cell that bombed the US embassy in Kenya tells an FBI agent about a conversation he had with his cell's leader. The leader told him that al-Qaeda was planning an attack on the US, but “Things are not ready yet."

August 1998
US intelligence finds information that bin Laden's next operation could possibly involve crashing an aircraft loaded with explosives into a US airport. This information is provided to senior US officials.

December 1998
A document prepared by the CIA and signed by Clinton states: “The intelligence community has strong indications that bin Laden intends to conduct or sponsor attacks inside the US.

December 21st 1998
In a Time magazine cover story entitled “The Hunt for Osama,” it is reported intelligence sources “have evidence that bin Laden may be planning his boldest move yet—a strike on Washington or possibly New York City in an eye-for-an-eye retaliation. ‘We've hit his headquarters, now he hits ours,’ says a State Department aide.”

Early 1999
MI6, the British intelligence agency, gives a secret report to liaison staff at the US embassy in London. The reports states that al-Qaeda has plans to use “commercial aircraft” in “unconventional ways”, “possibly as flying bombs.”
Nothing is done with the report.

1999
The FBI receive reports that a terrorist organization is planning to send students to the US for aviation training. The Counterterrorism Section at FBI headquarters instructs 24 field offices to pay close attention to Islamic students from the target country engaged in aviation training. An analyst at FBI headquarters conducts a study and determines that each year there are about 600 Middle Eastern students attending the 1000 flight schools in the U.S.

March 1999
US intelligence learns of plans by an al-Qaeda member who is also a US citizen, to fly a hang glider into the Egyptian Presidential Palace and then detonate the explosives he is carrying. The individual, who received hang glider training in the US, brings a hang glider back to Afghanistan, but various problems arise during the testing of the glider.

June 1999
In testimony before the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence and in a briefing to House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence staffers. The chief of the CTC describes reports that bin Laden and his associates are planning attacks in the US.

Setember 1999
A report prepared for US intelligence entitled the “Sociology and Psychology of Terrorism” is completed. It states: “Al-Qaeda's expected retaliation for the US cruise missile attack … could take several forms of terrorist attack in the nation's capital. Al-Qaeda could detonate a Chechen-type building-buster bomb at a federal building. Suicide bomber(s) belonging to al-Qaeda's Martyrdom Battalion could crash-land an aircraft packed with high explosives (C-4 and Semtex) into the Pentagon, the headquarters of the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), or the White House. Whatever form an attack may take, bin Laden will most likely retaliate in a spectacular way.” The report is by the National Intelligence Council, which advises the President and US intelligence on emerging threats.

Late 1999
The first phase of the US Commission on National Security/21st Century, co-chaired by former Senators Gary Hart (D) and Warren Rudman ® is issued. It concludes: “America will be attacked by terrorists using weapons of mass destruction and Americans will lose their lives on American soil, possibly in large numbers”
Earlier in December, the CIA estimates that al-Qaeda will launch between five to 15 attacks against American targets around the world over the New Year's weekend. “Because the US is [bin Laden]'s ultimate goal…we must assume that several of these targets will be in the US… ” Since late 1999, there is intelligence that targets in Washington and New York would be attacked at this time. There in fact are a number of planned attacks, including bomb attacks on the Boston and Los Angeles airports, a hotel in Jordan, and a naval ship in Yemen. But all of the attacks are foiled, thanks to a good deal of luck.

March 2000
US intelligence obtains information about the types of targets that bin Laden's network might strike. Specially mentioned are the Statue of Liberty as are skyscrapers, ports, airports, and nuclear power plants.

Amazing how the former Clinton admisistration is so quick to point fingers when they were recieving the same vague warnings for years and did absolutly nothing about it.

Now that the 9-11 report is out, the information is there for anyone who wants to read it.


eulogy
QUOTE
4. 1998 - the year of the Lewinsky, Al-Qaeda blew up the US embassies in Kenya and Tanzania. Over 200 people were killed and over 6,000 injured. Clinton's response? The missile strike of the medicine factory and an EMPTY terrorist camp.


again im just 16 i didnt know all that you guys just said but , the year of lewinsky,clinton was in court half the time so he couldnt do his job. im just saying that could be a reason y justice wasnt done.
DIESEL
but of course everyone is allowed an opion...thank god for freedom of speech
lithium
I had a feeling Real that you will try to deflect blame on Clinton and I was expecting that. All I hear from Republican Party since Bush came to White House is " Blame on Clinton". I'm not going to defend Clinton and I'm not going to bash Bush. One thing I see on your forum is that you guys breath intolerance and you are not able to have civilized conversation. You guys are so right and everyone with different opinion must be idiot. If this is the way you want it to, be it. It is after all your website.
I can live with knowing that you are very opinionated and devoted to your cause individual. I admire your devotion and energy in spreading your point of view. But you do not know me, so don't make it personal and don't call me a dumbest. I did not ever think of you this way and I will never call you any names, even if in my mind you were far away from the truth.
I also said "one of many responsible" not the only one.
Silver
QUOTE (lithium @ Jul 28 2004, 04:41 PM)
.....All I hear from Republican Party since Bush came to White House is " Blame on Clinton"......I also said "one of many responsible" not the only one.

ok i didnt vote for bush or clinton last time. i liked clinton but he was full of shit. but so is bush. they all are. cilinton took the w keys off the keyboards at the white house. childish. neither bush or clinton or any red white and blue american is responsible for the acts of 9-11.the people responsible are the ones that acted out the orders of the attack. the pilots had a choice to carry out the orders or not. they did. its osamas fault for ordering and planning. regardless, it took a person to commit the acts they did not have to act that out, they choose to. put the blame were it belongs. nothing could have stopped the attacks, everyone has to find someone to blame to make it all better. there is no one left to blame except osama and company. fuck i voted for nader, he would have smoked a joint insted of war. guess im glad we had bush. all this bullshit about kerry and bush, they are bolth assholes LIKE nader and aint any of them gonna help the poor or the middle class. maybe a poor guy should be prez and shit would change...
realdeal
QUOTE (lithium @ Jul 28 2004, 04:41 PM)

I had a feeling Real that you will try to deflect blame on Clinton and I was expecting that.


I think it's the other way around. You blamed it on Bush because it happened "on his watch" I was just stating the facts.

QUOTE (lithium @ Jul 28 2004, 04:41 PM)

One thing I see on your forum is that you guys breath intolerance and you are not able to have civilized conversation. You guys are so right and everyone with different opinion must be idiot. If this is the way you want it to, be it. It is after all your website.


Not true. We welcome everyone's input on polictics. I think you mistook my post for saying I am right and you are wrong. You said:
"You right Real. We will never forget Mr. Bush for his incompetence. It happened on his watch and he should be one of many responsible for it. "

And I just responded with my view on the subject along with facts.

QUOTE (lithium @ Jul 28 2004, 04:41 PM)

But you do not know me, so don't make it personal and don't call me a dumbest.


Uh, I never said you were dumb.

QUOTE (lithium @ Jul 28 2004, 04:41 PM)

I did not ever think of you this way and I will never call you any names, even if in my mind you were far away from the truth.


The truth speaks for itself. What I wrote was factual. Not an opinion.

eulogy
d. i think your right.. no one is lookin out for the middle class. republicans help the rich and demorcrats help the poor and somewhat middle. (basic breakdown)
Silver
i dont think anyone trys to help anyone. republicans think that they can help themselves by cutting their taxes and taxing the rich and mid class, the dems think that they can get rich by giving the poor and mid class a tiny incentive to spend more money. they do help the poor work for mc ds and the republicans try and help the poor work for bk. so unless u can make it on ur own ur screwed. i really try and not get involved in politics cuz i view them very odd. there is no good politican and there is no good lawyers. they try and screw u no matter what.
lithium
QUOTE
Sorry Lithium but thats one of the dumbest things you could say.


This was your openning line of your reply to my post Real.
realdeal
QUOTE (lithium @ Jul 29 2004, 11:43 AM)
QUOTE
Sorry Lithium but thats one of the dumbest things you could say.


This was your openning line of your reply to my post Real.

Hey Sherlock, take another look at who your quoting.

Also, although I did not say it. I would have to agree with the statement. Remember, no one called you dumb, he just said it was a dumb thing to say.
Blakjak
I don't understand why people blame Clinton and his administration for this mess. Shit happens in every President's term, whether it's a war, terorist attack, depression, and so on. Did Clinton cut defense spending, yes, but so have lot's of presidents in our past. Such things are inevitable. Could 9/11 been prevented? Maybe, but imho I believe if you are resourceful and daring enough, any attack can be carried out. The true test of Bush's resovle came not before or when the planes hit the towers but his response to the attacks. Afghanistan got what was coming to them, but Iraq is a whole other problem. Jimmy Carter tried to rescue the hostages but failed. Eisenhower, Kennedy, Johnson, and Nixon were all faced with containing Communism and only did marginal until Nixon finally realized it didnt work and introduced his detente policy- of course only after the U.S. sent billions of dollars to 2nd and 3rd world countries trying to prevent the spread of Communism only to have that money essentially stolen and used for other things. What I find most disturbing about this whole upcoming election is how much attention is being given to Iraq and how relatively little is being devoted to domestic policy. Personally I don't give a shit about Iraq anymore, I've had enough. There are much more concerning issues to me happening in my city and state rather than some fucked up 3rd world country on the other side of the world.
Druid
Lithium that would of been me.
There is a rather big difference between calling someone dumb and calling what they said dumb.

I just get tired of all the finger pointing at Bush and his administration, 90% of which people are either unwilling or unable to back up their reason for.

The idea he's responsible because it happened on HIS watch is simple view for a very complex problem. Go back and read my post again, there were warning signs of a POSSIBLE attack for close to ten years. No one did anything, but the fact is no one really could of done anything or it's very doubtful.
We are at incredible risk for the simple fact we live in the freest society in the world.
It's so easy for people to play monday morning quarterback. Go back and read my post listing all the warning signs. It would be very easy for someone to now say "Look we knew all of this, something should of or could of been done".
After the fact, it's very easy to pick the relevant intelligence information which related to al-Qaeda and say here is what we knew and should of acted on. You have to remember the dozen items I listed where out of probably millions of pieces of intelligence information over the last 10 years.

Here are some of the issues nobody seems to be talking about.
This is just my opinion so take it or leave it.
9-11 is the largest single loss of life on American soil since the revolutionary war. ( Pearl Harbor doesn't count as Hawaii wasn't a state until 18 years after the Japanese attack )
The single biggest mistake concerning terrorism was until 9-11 it was viewed as a legal problem and terrorist where seen as criminals.
This should of changed after the Khobar Towers bombing which killed 19 and wounded almost 400. The people responsible where charged with murder. This didn't go near far enough as it didn't go after the people ( al-Qaeda ) and counties who assisted them.
9-11 points to a failure by our security and intelligence communities. A large part of the failure was not their fault but do to the fact , by law they are limited when it comes to sharing information. Part of this problem was fixed with the patriot act.
The war on terror almost always comes down to a political debate because of the striking difference on how both side would handle the situation. I'm not a big Bush fan but I fully support what he's done so far about the war on terror. He made a very important distinction no one has made before. He changed the view of terrorism being simply a criminal act to classify countries who support and harbor terrorist as one and the same. This is exactly what should of been done long ago.

lithium
My bad Real. Disregard what I said about name-calling. Sorry.
I saw that you are in NY. I know that town well. I use to live in Rego Park just next to Queens Plaza Mall and before that Flashing and Greenpoint (Brooklyn)
Da_Rat
Great Work Guys.........FUCK Kerry the long face fag

Rat
Hard Drive
Druid quote:
I just get tired of all the finger pointing at Bush and his administration, 90% of which people are either unwilling or unable to back up their reason for.


I know that people are giving Bush hell about the terror attacks and I might be one of them. But I am pissed off because he did not go after the right person. Sadam did not create those terror attacks. He might of supported yeah, but so did so many Americans because we do not know where all of our money goes to when we purchase things from conv. stores like gas or what ever. That terror attack that happened on the trade center was planned for a long time. The US can not stop every terror attack. And I cant listen to a man who wants to play God and think he can stop all terror attacks. This War on Terror campaign is a crock of shit.

Like I said before, Bush hasn't got the guy really responsible for it.


As for what you said Rat, Bush is nothing but a little beety eyed fucker who made some wrong decision. action-smiley-055.gif

Silver
QUOTE (Hard Drive @ Sep 18 2004, 11:47 PM)
This War on Terror campaign is a crock of shit.

better then the war on drugs
smile.gif
Hard Drive
I dont see it.
Bargod
If you want to get REALLY technical about it, what caused 9/11 was WW1, the same war that created Hitler's Germany. Yes, this might sound crazy, but if you are a historian, you would realize that after WW1 the western powers divided up the Ottoman Empire. Actually, we could go back further, but I think WW1 is far enough for now. The middle east was a single empire back then divided into what we might today call clans (I don't know what they called it). Then, after WW1, the western powers divvied up the area into arbitrary countries that they took ran as "colonies". This created much havoc, much as the breakup of the Soviet Union has created havoc in Eastern Europe.
Osama Bin Laden, and Al Qaeda's main goal is to recapture the Ottoman Empire and more. They want all the lands that were once ruled by the Muslims. This would include all the land up into Spain. So, regardless who is the leader of any Western country, the goal is the same. So much blame is cast around that people lose site of the fact that the real villian is Osama and AQ.
Since I mentioned being able to go back before WW1, we could go back to the crusades. They are fighting a VERY old war. A war that they see as never having ended. This war started before the US existed!
What needs to be done to win the war is to stop blaming each other and focus on the real problem.
Druid
Wow I'm very impessive Bargod.
Your a little off base with some of your facts but your point is still very valid.
WW1 wouldn't be the cause, the ottoman empire began it's major decline in the 17th century. What was divided up in the Treaty of Sevres was little more than land once occupied by the former Ottoman empire, there wasn't really an empire left.
An interesting point which goes to the heart of your post.
I think everyone knows about the Holocaust commited by the Germans.
Yet the second biggest Holocaust in the last century goes completely unnoticed.
The Armenian Holocaust also known as the Christian Holocaust claimed the lives of 1.5 - 2.5 million people, 3.5 million if you add the number killed in the few years leading up to it. This was done when the Moslem leader ( can't remember his name ) ruled all Christians in the Ottoman Empire, should be put to death.
Silver
QUOTE (Hard Drive @ Sep 19 2004, 02:19 AM)
I dont see it.

we can never win the war on drugs, we dont have enough money and morale support to stop it. the drug czars have more money then the United States could ever throw at the war and the people the Gov. is trying to protect are using the drugs and dont want to be protected. i would say 25% of the population use drugs of some. (such as taking medication that dont belong to you, like anti biotics and pain killers.) some people who dont have health ins. use drugs that are illegal to help with problems that they could have treated in a medical setting. pot is cheaper then some stomach meds and pain killers. (people also use it as a sleeping aid, i know one person who use'd it that way. she dont get high just enough to go to sleep) and 2 bucks a pop for light pain killers such as hydrocordone is pretty cheap compared to hosptial visit and price for pain meds. so when you bitch about paying for health care for the welfare people just think if they didnt have it that it contributes to the drug problem not as a large slot but it does help it.
OFF TOPIC I KNOW BUT HEY....
Char
I am new here, and this appears to be older thread but I felt like I had to say something.

Why are we at war against terrorism. I start with a quote.

"The seeds of totalitarian regimes are nurtured by misery and want. They spread and grow in the evil soil of poverty and strife. They reach their full growth when the hope of a people for a better life has died. We must keep that hope alive.
The free peoples of the world look to us for support in maintaining their freedoms.
If we falter in our leadership, we may endanger the peace of the world -- and we shall surely endanger the welfare of our own nation.
Great responsibilities have been placed upon us by the swift movement of events.
I am confident that the Congress will face these responsibilities squarely."
Truman Doctrine 1947

The words spoken here are true today as they were true in Truman's day. Change totalitarianism to terrorism.

Islam is the worlds only major religion that has not undergone reform (except for maybe become more militant and oppressive) This war is between the old and the new. The Middle East struggles to hold onto old obsolete ideas while the world around them is evolving. The lack of freedom and liberty in the Middle East is the main cause for the rise of terrorism. They hate the fact that we have freedom of speech, freedom of religion, and that woman are eqal to men. They are taught to hate and kill the infadels or the people who do not agree with their twisted religion. They oppress their people and blame Western Culture for demise. The only hope they give their people is that if they strap bombs to themselves and blow themselves up or hijack planes and use them as missiles, and to walk besides allah in paradise with their 72 virgins.
I believe that the only hope for peace is to destroy militant Islam and show Arabs that there is a better way and a better life through freedom, liberty, and capitolism.

Did you know the average unemployment rate of Arab countries in 20-30 percent.
Take the U.S. and Japan.
U.S. avg rate what 5.7% 5.4 right now
Japan avg rate about 5% 4.9 right now

France and Germany are a cross between socialism and capitolism.
France and Germany have avg unemployment rates of about 9% on a good day

I believe if the Arab people had some freedom, liberty, and capitolism they would spend more time working and living life and less time to think about how to kill infadels.

We are in the middle of WW4. it will be long and bloddy and many will die on both side. It may be a generation or 2 before we see the outcome of this battle. But I believe we need to fight this battle now and on the turf.

We cannot count on some of our traditional allies. I've always believed that Western Europe was our closest allies, in spite of some cultural differences. But it is now clear from the oil for food fiasco that our so called allies such as France have been aiding and arming our enemies and undermininding American interests. I no longer believe that some traditional allies (the ones Jon Kerry thinks he can bring on board) should no longer be considered allies.


As for the comments on social issues such as healthcare, welfare, and schools you need to take a hard look at the Constitution. And if you have a hard time understanding its intent you need to take a look at the Federalist papers. %85 of the principles in the Fed papers are in the Constitution and are the best source in learning the intent of the founders when composing the Constitution. When I was in school they barely went over the Constitution and did not even mention the Federalist papers.

I think someone said that if you can't make it in your own then you are screwed. I hate break it to you but the whole purpose are designed so that people can make it on their own without the govenment. If you believe that govenment is supposed to take care of you then you live in the country. If you believe that it is governments responsibility to take care of you tan you probably do not believe in the Constitution or the principles and values on which it was founded.

Char
Ghslongpole14
Yeah, before anybody says anything, I know this is REAL late but i watched the 9/11 videos again and they really pissed me off.

Lithium, that first post you wrote pissed me off real bad because you pin the blame on Bush because "it was under his watch". What the cussing.gif ? Like Druid said (i think) FDR should be responsible for pearl harbor? If you were president and some crazy-ass extremist blew up the White House, would it be fair to say it's partially your fault because it was under your watch? Come on, man!

I am kinda scared about what would happen if Kerry is president and there is another attack. I'm only 15 and not really a political genius, but i can smell his pussy from down here in NC! Bush had the balls to hunt down Osama and Saddam on their turf, and here SURE AS HELL bagged Saddam like the little BIOTCH he is! Sure people died, but that's what happens during war. Plus, he probably saved a helluva lot of lives in the process. Sure the US hasn't bagged Osama, but if I had the resources he does and lived in cave country, I could probably hide my ass pretty well, too. Hell, he's probably somewhere else, like Pakistan, hanging out while his dialysis machine chugs away!

Anyway, that's a 15 year old's view of the political world and it's probaly incorrect, but that's my two cents!

PS: cussing.gif KERRY!
Ghslongpole14
Sorry if that offends any people in particular because I respect everybody's POV, but that post by Lithium, in my opinion, was incredibly off.
holden_caulfield
You make a good point, but I think the formal dissolution of the Ottoman Empire is only partly to blame. A huge part of this problem lies with Israel and its creation after WWII. Prior to 1948, the people living in Palestine (both Jews and Muslims) were, for the most part, amicable. Of course, the presence of the British occupiers would have had a hand in stifling any potential unrest, but, for the most part, there was peace in the region. Today historians can only point out the glaringly obvious fact that in creating a homogenous and democratic Israeli state while simultaneously dispossesing millions of peaceful Palestinians of their homes, the western powers sowed the first seeds of bitterness and division. Now the palestinians have no home, they have no government, they have not been brought into the modern world, and, to rub salt in their wounds, they live right next door to what is essentially USA Lite (jewish modern society). They're pissed, their jealous, and their frustration is arguably justifiable.

This is no excuse for terrorism; there is none. But what we have to understand is that this conflict of west vs. east is very very complex, and that the very real anger of the common middle eastern man has been manipulated and channeled for the advantage of those who govern them. And these demagogues, who are truly evil men, have turned a socio-political conflict into a cultural/religous one. Why? Because religous conflicts can never be reconciled: assimilate or be assimilated, kill or be killed. That is their philosophy. Religion is a source of power, and it is so blinding that the slaves cannot see their own enthrallment.

So in this sense I completely agree with you. The men who are fueling this hate, men like Osama and AQ, they must be eleminated. I think a central issue of this seemingly Republican/Democrat split on this forum is whether Saddam falls into this category, and consequently whether he should have been eleminated. With the exception of Turkey, he ran the most secular government in the Middle East. My opinion is nay. Let's get the real bastards.
Silver
look at the way the brittish left isreal, in a hell of alot of trouble. isreal fought hard for its statehood along with countless conflicts and "wars". on a side note the united states was not been isreals bestest friend in the begining, but supplied weapons etc. the un let isreal down countless times and hence isreal has always been proactive in its plight. probally the only reason it is alive. though i must say it seem isreal is developing a wait and see prospective with palistine since the death of arafat(?). and for saddam, we all knew someday we would have to wage s war with them (again) it was more of a when.
Oh You
QUOTE
we can never win the war on drugs, we dont have enough money and morale support to stop it. the drug czars have more money then the United States could ever throw at the war

-Silver



That exact quote would make just as much sense if you switched the word drug, with Terror, and drug czars with Terrorists. You can't win the War on Terror, just like you can't win the War on Drugs.

QUOTE
Because religous conflicts can never be reconciled: assimilate or be assimilated, kill or be killed. That is their philosophy. Religion is a source of power, and it is so blinding that the slaves cannot see their own enthrallment.

-holden_caulfield

You, took the words right out of my mouth. Nearly, if not every war in the history of the World has been because of, or affected by Religion. And while Religion exists (and it always will) there will always be extremists, terrorists, and there will always be wars.

Silver
QUOTE(Oh You @ 04/06/06 10:34pm) *

QUOTE
we can never win the war on drugs, we dont have enough money and morale support to stop it. the drug czars have more money then the United States could ever throw at the war

-Silver



That exact quote would make just as much sense if you switched the word drug, with Terror, and drug czars with Terrorists. You can't win the War on Terror, just like you can't win the War on Drugs.


the war on drugs is much diffrent then the war on terror.... they both hold violence but one can be corrected one cannot. truly what innocient life is lost in the war on drugs? the 8 y/o being brought up in a crack house hit by a stray bullet? that is the same one wearing "Thug in training" white t.
war on drugs can be stopped with legalization and clinics, and promote business ventures and communinty growth.

I doubt Bin Laden commits terror to put food on HIS table and will stop the deaths to open a corner store... but you can ask him... and tell us what he says right before he cuts your head off with a butter knife....

wink.gif
Rommel
QUOTE(realdeal @ 06/27/04 7:29pm) *
Unfortunately some forget, others may simply put it out of their mind since it's been almost 3 years now. But please take a look at the links below to remind yourself.

FIRST PLANE HITS THE WORLD TRADE CENTER


SECOND PLANE HITS THE WORLD TRADE CENTER

EXCLUSIVE FOOTAGE OF SECOND PLANE HITTING THE WORLD TRADE CENTER

CNN RECAP OF 9/11


my opinion in this case is clear 9/11 is the reason. we will never forget. Terror is a cowardly way to make someone change their mind

ph34r.gif This is a terrorist, flamethrowingsmiley.gif



FeezyWeezy
You know that I never say anything about War on Terror, and what not. As I believe that only people that know the facts should talk. Emotional feelings of rage and anger always get people fucked up, one way or another.

I believe in that every soul is a manupilator. you change your suroundings the way that it fits you. Some fail with even a tiny change, some make big changes that involve everyone.
War on Terror. Is it psoible to have a war on Terror?
Terror, how I see it, is 1 group of people / person doing something very very unpleasant to another group or person so that they will lose certain of their welfare. You could even see a worldtrade ban from the world towards 1 country as a sort of terrorism. It will cause some political fear. And thats what Terror is about, spreading fear and weaken him with it.
As long as there are humans there will be greed, jelousy and so on. Terror will always excist. There is "no" way you can fight it.

Our troops go to Afganistan, the area is heavily unstable so my personal opinion is that our lightly armed troops have no place there. (Uruzgan) I believe that one day that there should come people to aid these people. But a heavy militairy force wont help on a War on Terror. A War on Terror. You can't fight Terror with arms. What people do now in the middle-east is simple: Fight Terror with Terror. A tank shooting at homes would get me scared.
Radical groups that use the way of Terror use the terror used against them as a fuel to fuel their own terror.
See, they are shooting our apartment flats. See they hate us. We can be better than them, by using some godly believe to justify our means of force.

Terrorists use believe of something radical to justify terror.
Western comunity freedom.

People should simply leave me alone with their believes when I dont ask about them. I'm no chirstian, muslim, yew, buhdist or whatsoever and I hardly care about their stories. (specialy when they come from a radical extremists mouth)
Freedom you cant push down onto people. And is western freedom freedom? Western sociaty is fucked up with lack of morals. Sex drugs and voilence is the habbit of the day. Fuck everyone that looks hot, become a teenage mom..YAY!! (stupid sluts that are..) Spank myself daily with some cocaine...yum yum..and the voilence of stealing is the only way left. Somer parts of the US have a poverty rate of 43%. They cant go away, cant work more (some work 15-16hours a day for 350 dollar) and they live in insecurity day by day.
Democratcy is maybe a certain freedom, but people should want it.

Is there no way to fight terror?
There is,
Education. THATS THE ONLY WAY.

Hellfighter
I'd go a step further;
Create an even economic playing field universally> yes through education, but in so-doing nullify prime enrolment strategy of terrorists - poor who have nothing productive to give the world or share in being a productive world citizen. Destroy the idea that since they are poor and frustrated, they might as well die for 'a cause' and hurt others in the process, all this as they are convinced by the monsters running terror organisations; and an educated person would wonder why these loud-mouthed anti-heroes aren't doing the suicidal bombings, but instead hiding in caves.
Radiation
.
Crazy Canuck
QUOTE(Radiation @ 05/04/06 11:27am) *
Death solves all problems, no man... no problem --J Stalin.


LOL .... I like it !

Silver
feezy how can you comment on western ideals from what you read in mainstream media? you cant, if you think that we have lack of morals here (which we do...) you cant hep but observe your own land or the land of the middleeast.
what morals do a group of ppl have that come to help your children and you let them. when they are done building your schools, etc you cut their heads off on the net so their families can see? Europe is as fucked up as we are if not more in some cases. we all have issues, some worse then others, but the diffrence in ppl society reflects what moral obligations and issues should be delt with.

I agree with Radiation, no man no problem.

maybe if the rest of the world wasnt so pussified maybe the US wouldnt have to spend Billions and send OUR troops over their to solve everyones problems. we fucked up 2 times, WW2 for not standing up to germany and japan before we did. thinking that the countries over there would have settled it. then came 9-11 thinking that the countries would stop the crazy terrorists...
we stop BS when it comes to wars...
now we will stop the terrorists were they are! our land or urs
FeezyWeezy
I said Western world, WESTERN...thats US, CANADA, UK, NORWAY, SWEDEN, THE NTHERLANDS, BELGIUM, GERMANY, FRANCE, SPAIN, ITALY etc. etc.

Maybe I should remind you that its not just the US sitting in the middle east.

Silver
just so you know that wsnt directed at you (even though i directed it at u)... I am tired of the anti-american sentiment on our servers... BTW the world revolves around us feez.. hahahahaha
Lord Lipton
okay, am i diggin up old soil? yes probably. but i'm going to side with Real and Druid and everyone else. its not Bush's fault. How could he have stopped the plane? Wasn't he in a room with children reading kids stories? this terror could've happened under any president, and probably would have.



but its not for me to say it WOULD for sure or it WOULD NOT for sure.





god politics.......crazy shit.

Hellfighter
I don't think Anti-Bush = anti american.... 68% of Americans don't even favour Bush's current policies. I was for the move to go into Iraq based on Iraqi dissients [now known as fake] reports on WMD - call it a 'better safe than sorry' mentality / like Churchill's misgivings about the Fascists prior to WW2. While the military did their part knifing to Baghdad, Bush and his neocon dummies messed up with phase 2 in establishing law and order in that critical part of Iraq... in short there was no plan at all for it/ only false hope. In my opinion this is where Bush, Cheney and Rumsfeld should've had a trapdoor open beneath them to dump into Hell. How many soldier's died needlessly because of the lax attitude of the Bush administration to fortify the intital sucess thereby giving the terrorists the thumbs up to exploit the strategic flaw, and to flood into central Iraq and turn the place into a grinding inferno.

I have to say, keep in mind the West has their own form of psychos running around on a scale of monstrosity equivalent to those butchering/bombing terrorists SOBs [ who in my opinion,are cold bloodied murderers just masquerading as killing for an agenda]. Monsters in the West, namely;-
Timothy McVeigh, Serial killers, mass murdering spree killers, schoool rampage killers, doctors/nurses murdering-killing dozens [and in one case in the UK recently hundreds of patients], priests molesting kids by the dozens, gangs raping neighbourhoods with drug activity.
I'm just saying while we see massive rantings over in 'select' places of the Muslim world, its not fair to brand the majority of Muslims as being happy when heads get sawed off on video. Fortunately our society has a system where thugs can't take control and repress its population into intimidation and not speaking out as they see fit. I have many arab friends here who are nervous as hell for their families in places like Iraq and many of them [here and over there] would love to see the extremist bullies taken out and a democratic society prevail. But the thugs/mullahs in some places hold terrifying sway over how people can express themselves, and as you can imagine, the doctrine if you aren't jumping about in the street voicing anti-West sentiments, then you must be on their side-> and the ramifications of that cannot be pleasant.
My point is about keeping the venom saved for the few hardcore devils trully stirring up the mess over there. I believe it's their aim to establish a wider 'us vs. them' mentality ie, Crusader West vs. Islam for their own power-tripping schemes, since they know, that without the masses of suckers to prop them up into 'power', they are as significant as slimy cockroaches.


QUOTE(Lord Lipton @ 05/04/06 8:50pm) *
okay, am i diggin up old soil? yes probably. but i'm going to side with Real and Druid and everyone else. its not Bush's fault. How could he have stopped the plane? Wasn't he in a room with children reading kids stories? this terror could've happened under any president, and probably would have.



but its not for me to say it WOULD for sure or it WOULD NOT for sure.





god politics.......crazy shit.



The whole point is why were the leaders asleep knowing a potential tragedy could unfold[Bush and Clinton].... their focus sidetracked to other issues at the time- so in that sense they do get blame. In a 9-11 enquiry a few years back, Condoleeza Rice was asked about her having ANY knowledge of a potential Al quaeda attack in the US.... they specifically asked about intelligence documents she was aware of prior to 9-11, to which she shamelessly faked a fuzzy memory attitude and non-chalantly said "I believe the title [of the document] was Bin Laden plans to attack the U.S with planes" [maybe not the exact quote] So knowing that much, one would assume Bush and his staff would set out to ramp up airport/airline security at the very least! And sure this Al Quaeada scumbag who just got life yesterday had info he could've divulged to stop 9-11 partially or entirely but other opportunities were missed.
dienamic
Let me see here.....

I have to say, keep in mind the West has their own form of psychos running around on a scale of monstrosity equivalent to those butchering/bombing terrorists SOBs [ who in my opinion,are cold bloodied murderers just masquerading as killing for an agenda]. Monsters in the West, namely;-
Timothy McVeigh, Serial killers, mass murdering spree killers, schoool rampage killers, doctors/nurses murdering-killing dozens [and in one case in the UK recently hundreds of patients], priests molesting kids by the dozens, gangs raping neighbourhoods with drug activity.


I don't believe Any of these "bad Americans or UK doctors" ever high jacked a plane and caused the deaths of thousands unsuspecting people in the Middle east. This is what the post is about right?

What you are all failing to remeber by even drudging up this post is; We did not order these vicious ass whipes to do this on our soil much like the way you order a pizza. I am very pissed at the government right now, but by no means do I even for 1 second have any pity on the extremist or thier kind dying in the middle east that came and killed innocent people. The problem is as follows....."all" Countries are just as responsible for stopping this bull shit as we are. The problem is most commonly.....they are goverened by spineless passive idiots period. Say what you want about America, at least we are trying to do something about it.

BTW, not trying to offend anyone, I am just damn tired of this hype.

I define anyone who would stand by and do nothing to stop terrorist spineless and yes idiotic....sorry.

angry2.gif
Hellfighter
QUOTE

I don't believe Any of these "bad Americans or UK doctors" ever high jacked a plane and caused the deaths of thousands unsuspecting people in the Middle east. This is what the post is about right?


Wrong.
Since you asked though......
I see your point Dienamic but I was replying to another post in this thread that was equating a whole society to the extremists that have a grip of terror over the non-fanatical-minded citizens in those parts. To me those terrorists are vile killing machines whose governments obviously do little to crush - out of fear or complicity, they are like cancer cells that have been permitted to spread -> globally; My point is it would be just as ridiculous for non-Westerners to label our society as evil because of monstrous predators in our society - over zealous 'reiligious' propoganda which in fact the terrorists spread to their prospective recruits...

To me killers of innocent people and kids wherever they strike are all slime of the same level. To me terrorists are unleashed demons bent on slaughtering thousands without remorse - like Timothy McVeigh and serial killers who are not too far from the tip of that iceberg. They too kill thousands out of sadistic pleasure each year. Well knowing me by now, I just don't like seeing those who did nothing to support the evil do-ers, get in the justifiable avenging crosshairs just because they're in the same 'neighbourhood'.
QUOTE

What you are all failing to remeber by even drudging up this post is; We did not order these vicious ass whipes to do this on our soil much like the way you order a pizza...



Just about everyone was for going into Afghanistan to destroy Al Quaeda and hopefully vapourise trash-bin laden. The decision to go into Iraq was about WMDs and potential ties to radical terrorists-- not 9-11 NOT 9-11.

QUOTE

I am very pissed at the government right now, but by no means do I even for 1 second have any pity on the extremist or thier kind dying in the middle east that came and killed innocent people.


I doubt you saw anything in my post that had any pity, emphathy, or rationalizing at all for terrorist scum.

QUOTE

The problem is most commonly.....they are goverened by spineless passive idiots period.


That's my point.... the general population in those countries aren't protected from the radical thugs so unless they're prepared to revolt and string up the terrorists the radicals will maintain power, but let's not assume an entire society wants to bash democracy.

QUOTE
Say what you want about America, at least we are trying to do something about it.


Again you may have missed my point.... I was pro-war like you, and anti-current Bush government now- like you.... nothing anti-american on my part there if that was the inference.


QUOTE
BTW, not trying to offend anyone, I am just damn tired of this hype.

I define anyone who would stand by and do nothing to stop terrorist spineless and yes idiotic....sorry.



I think you missed the very first part of my post;
............... I was for the move to go into Iraq based on Iraqi dissients [now known as fake] reports on WMD - call it a 'better safe than sorry' mentality / like Churchill's misgivings about the Fascists prior to WW2. ......
Not standing up to terrorists is suicidal sooner or later.

dienamic
I just pulled some stuff outta your post man to make a point. I know how you stand about terrorist. BTW, I hope I did not lead you to think I am anti Bush because of his stand on terror. I am however pissed at him because when we first went into this thing he urged the American people to spend money.

Now 4 to 5 years later we are paying double for gas, up to triple for credit card intrest and many adjustable home loans are now rocketing leaving a lot of people filing bankrupcy or worse.

Yes, I am pissed about all this to no end. But make no mistake about where I stand about terrorist and anyone that would sympathize with them or thier deranged causes. To tell the truth man I am really fed up hearing about it being right or wrong.

This reminds me of our great democracy. I am not a democrat nor republican but one thing is for sure. The democrats are all for change for the better until it starts costing them something.

I am sorry if I offended you as that was not what I was trying to do. I kinda think you took it that way evident by the scripting of my post sentence by sentence. The thing that bothers me the most is everyone is a critic of what America is doing, yet they are doing little or nothing to aid in the cause.

My own business is suffering because of the economy and I know several small businesses that have already failed. Now couple that with scores of fixed income Americans that are losing thier homes because they cannot pay the increased flexable morgages that were not supposssed to go up before pay off as like the so called fixed credit card percentages.

In the end, I just don't give a shit about what everyone else thinks....my point is belly up to the bar or make room for a patron if you get my drift.

Now saying all that, again I meant you no personal harm and I truely hope you did not take it that way.

Hellfighter
QUOTE(dienamic @ 05/05/06 11:19pm) *
I........

Now saying all that, again I meant you no personal harm and I truely hope you did not take it that way.


Heyyy Dienamic, absolutely no explaination needed let alone apology old chum tongue.gif tongue.gif tongue.gif , LOL hearing someone else's viewpoint doesn't harm me at all> and usually I'm all for engaging in a lively discussion on a topic I may see from a different angle-and this doesn't mean I'm out to twist someone to drop their viewpoint, merely expose them to my opinion .... You should know I just like blabbing my point, and it reflects no disrespect to your viewpoints, which I think we both agree on many when it comes down to it. , and again I'm not a 'blame it on America' person- I personally defend American interventions alot when it's brought up in conversations ->> I just hated how Bush and coy. blew things right after Baghdad fell [leadership vacuum]- resulting in many more US/Coalition soldiers/iraqis dying needlessly. I was merely itemizing my 'issues' just so as to clarify I'm not wimpy on terrorists, and how I define mass murderers of any kind as equally monstrous. Of course globally, extremists are the no.1 menace.
I'm always your pal 2_thumbs_up_-_animated.gif [sniff, sniff *]

maybe, maybe... after the last 1500 years of constant wars, Europe is kind of hanging back from initiating major conflicts, that along with non bankrupting themselves due to engaging in a major war. Many euro nations lost all their colonies and mini-empires after ww2 so their means to finance offensive-capable armies has disappeared... in my opinion.

ps. I can emphathize with you too Dienamic. I'm self employed and alot of my $$$ depends on American tourism. Up here in Quebec I have friends with souvenir shops who are getting devastated by the big drop in Americans travelling here. You can imagine the worldwide effects. On this point I don't actually blame Bush [believe it or not ohmy.gif ]
9-11 changed everything , all over the world economically too for many 'small guys/gals' with tourism related businesses.What I wouldn't give to be first in line to drop-kick trash-bin laden and his baboon cohorts repeatedly for 48 hours straight before the rest of the free world takes their turn on him......
Churchill
like Churchill's misgivings about the Fascists prior to WW2. ......

There is similarities to hitler and saddam

1.) Like Hitler, who repeatedly violated the terms of the Treaty of Versailles and the will of the League of Nations, Hussein has violated the conditions of the cease-fire ending the Gulf War; and, as in the German instance, his violations have been met by a plurality of nations bent on appeasement rather than disarmament.

2.) Saddam, like Adolf, participates in diplomatic dialogue to the extent that it buys him time to increase his arsenal.

3.) As Hitler used gas to perpetrate genocide upon the Jews, Hussein has used poison gas in his relentless persecution of the Kurds in his own nation.

4.) In Iraq, as in Nazi Germany, murder, kidnapping and imprisonment are employed liberally as means of squelching political discontent.

5.) Hussein tortured downed coalition airmen during the Gulf War as Hitler's Gestapo was known to do during World War II.

6.) As Hitler used the harsh economic reparations of the Versailles treaty to unify his people behind his cause, so Hussein has used the economic sanctions imposed on his nation to rally his people to his side.

7.) Hussein used the historical borders of his nation as an excuse to invade Kuwait, just as Hitler used the excuse of unifying all Germans as a premise for his occupation of Austria and the Sudetenland.

8.) During WWII, Hitler used rockets as terror weapons against the civilian population of Britain much as Saddam used Scuds against the people of Israel and Saudi Arabia.

9.) Similar to Stalin's non-aggression pact with Berlin in the previous war, which allowed Germany to focus its attention on the West, Hussein uses Yeltsin's opposition to a military solution to the current crisis as a counterweight to American and British proposals.

10.) And, lastly, Hussein, like Hitler, sports an ugly mustache that offends the fashion sense of every red-blooded American.


CommanderChoth
I'm not a huge fan of reading to see if I am being repetitive or to see if I'm off topic. But for all of you that think we are at war against "terrorism", ask yourselves, why on earth have we done jack-shit about the genocide in the Darfur region of Sudan. No, no gentlemen. We only stop terrorism when we have interests at hand.


The truth is that this country is incapable of doing great things anymore. Our leaders no longer challenge us to sacrifice. With this mentality We couldn't have put a man on the moon, we couldn't have built a transcontinental railroad. September 11th was a tragic, tragic day, but also a hoplessly squandered opportunity. If Bush had said, you guys, we gotta give up our dependence on foreign oil, we have to make sacrifices in order to rise above these terrorists, Americans would have given everything to help build this dream. But no, instead we sought revenge, but stupid, self-interested revenge. Iraq is bullshit. Americans are dying pointlessly when we could have instead united to build a better nation.


But then again, as George Orwell said: "War is peace".
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Invision Power Board © 2001-2026 Invision Power Services, Inc.