COD 4, Say it ain't so. Options

[MyWifesMule]

Found this today, written last month.


"A reliable source close to the Call of Duty development teams has revealed not only the existence of Call of Duty 4, but vital details surrounding the game as well, including the fact that it will be based on modern combat.

According to our source, Call of Duty 4 will be developed by Infinity Ward, the developer behind the first and second installments. The three-way deal established between Infinity Ward, Treyarch, and Activision states that Infinity Ward will develop all even numbered titles while Treyarch develops the odd numbered games, such as Call of Duty 3. Treyarch did develop Call of Duty 2: Big Red One as well, however.

As aforementioned, Call of Duty 4 is said to step away from the war torn locales of World War II, instead focusing on the battlefields of present day. It is unknown if it will take the same path as Electronic Arts’ Battlefield franchise, placing the spotlight on the Middle East."

Of course this is not OFFICIAL but I hope is not true.

[UNDEAD 1]

the thing is i am addicted to gaming . but i really like fps in mp and don't mess with the single player at all really.i do play games like chess and risk but since i was a young kid i have been absolutely fascinated with world war 2.i played with the toys as a child and read a lot of books when i got older,hell,i cant pass the history channel if anything ww2 is on.with this in mind,the first time i played a mp ww2 game i was instantly hooked and I'm pretty shore I'm not alone. i think this is what the guys upstairs are missing`!

i don't believe that the majority of the console buyers are play ww2 games.i know they probably could give a crap to know the difference between a panzer 4 and p5 . the bf series did this exact same thing,sucks! the ball is totally in mohs corner right now. im curious as to the difference in sales between- cod u/o,cod2 and cod3 -that could be interesting.

This post has been edited by UNDEAD 1: 01/04/07 6:53pm