Crying Game, Part II Options

[Robert]

Even more interesting than the original "Crying Game" topic mysteriously going missing, is a 2nd topic started last night by Hellfighter ( another MOB member ) to continue the discussion has also now been deleted, made invisible or otherwise removed from public view.


When I saw HF's new "Crying game" topic last night I almost replied to it. Then I thought to myself, what's the point, it would get deleted too.
So on a brighter note, I consider this as final irrefutable proof that I'm smarter than Hellfighter.
I was smart enough to not waste my time replying to a topic that an "admin" was going to delete
Even better is the giggles I get from how even MOB members are not allowed to post what they want on MOB's forum.
I have to wonder if the admin who deleted/removed these topics at least had the common courtesy to tell the MOB members who started them why they were removed.
Undoubtedly it would be in their best interest if they wouldn't bother asking why their post were deleted/removed.
They should just run along like good kids and let the people in charge make these hard and important decisions about what's acceptable on a gaming forum. Otherwise you may find yourself in time out.
LOL

Without a doubt the funniest thing is, a post about a Hillary Clinton signature perfume ( available in a bait shop near you )
that references her naughty place and the smell of dead rotting fish is acceptable.
While an adult, civil, intelligent and thought provoking debate gets deleted.

I was going to post this as a reply in the Gun Control, then decided I would hate to see that topic mysteriously go bye/bye too.
So I though it best if this post was all by itself, just in case.
Since I give this a 1/10 chance of not being removed with the new….
Censorship is Good
Control Freak R's Us
Limited Opinion Expression
Debates are the root of all evil
Forum,



BTW I plan on voting for what's her name.
You know, that one lady.
Monica Lewinsky's ex-boyfriends wife.

[Robert]

I'm going to do my best to clear up a few points as there seems to be a lot of confusion.

I specifically made my initial post ambiguous ( i.e. "Admins" ) I didn't call anyone out by name.
Seeing as how there are 4 admins and 3 mods who were capable of deleting the 1st topic and moving the 2nd to the regs area.
Why was Steel the only one who automatically got defensive and blasted me, then imply I manipulated the forums?
That boys and girls is called deflection.
Much the same as how some MOB members are now blaming me for Steel quitting.
The people blaming me over Steel quitting seem to have conveniently forgot both of those topics were started by MOB members, not me.
That makes me wonder if either of the MOB members who started the original topics would have been the ones to ask why a admin removed them without even bothering to say why or discuss their reason for doing so.
Would She have still freaked out and quit over it and if so, would it magically somehow still been MY fault?

So now I'm portrayed as the master manipulator with a gun to MOB's head.
Yes, I still have the domain and hosting in my name.
Care to explain how that matters.
If you think about it, the exact same thing could be said about whoever's name it's in.
I had two small requirements
My Druid signature wouldn't be deleted AGAIN.
My final post wouldn't be removed for 1 week, after that I said it could be deleted.
Those two things equal a gun to MOB's head?
If so, well get over it.
When I originally left after two years because of lack of time to play. The original server stayed in my name on the chance I might return when real life settled down and I and continued to pay a 3rd of the cost.
I don't remember anyone crying then about how bad, unfair or how it equaled a gun to MOB's head.
When I officially quit I kept full access to the site and servers , for the SOLE purpose of helping out when needed or solving any technical problems that may come up. That was right up until the incident with Sabot.
I don't remember anyone crying then about how bad, unfair or how it equaled a gun to MOB's head.
I must be an idiot because I don't see how me paying for the hosting and domain equates to me manipulating things.
So please explain to me how my 7 post in 3 topics has had a terrible manipulative effect.
Then again Steel may have been talking about 2 emails I sent to the admins.
Done privately so as not to publicity cause any problems.
If those two emails are what is being described as me trying to manipulate things.
Then by all means, I give you permission to post their contents here or in the private forums to show everyone what a huge manipulative ass I am.

It still cracks me up that a post about a Hillary Clinton signature perfume ( available in a bait shop near you )
that references her naughty place and the smell of dead rotting fish is acceptable.
While an adult, civil, intelligent and thought provoking discussion about current events, is suddenly inappropriate, doesn't belong here and deserved to get deleted.
All because 1 person got a hair up their #$% about it and chose to delete it without any discussion or consideration to the people who may not agree with her. Then quits when asked about it.
Oh wait, I'm sorry, I forgot, that's my fault.

BTW.
I'm amazed this topic wasn't moved the a private section as this is one of those rare topics that actually deserves it.
LMAO